POLAR Telecon Agenda for August 5th, 2005

Agenda:

0. Upcoming Polar Telecon

1. Operations:

2. MFE Data Processing Status

3. Senior Review Proposal

4. Resident Archives

 

0.  Upcoming Polar Telecons

Friday, August 5th, 2005

4 pm ET, 3 pm CT, 2 pm MT, 1 pm PT

PIs and their designated representatives will be telephoned at their usual numbers.

Other participants may call in at: 1-888-810-3139, password POLAR TELECON

(Leader: John Sigwarth)

 

The web site for the final agenda will be:

http://pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov/polar/telecons/2005Aug05/

 

Future Polar Telecons

Friday, August 26, 2005

Future Telecon Science Discussion Schedule

[Errors/omissions/preferences to: nicola.fox@jhuapl.edu

August 26 2005: CEPPAD

September 16 2005: TIDE

October 2005: PIXIE

November 2005: SEPS

January 2006: UVI

February 2005: MDI

March 2006: CAMMICE

April 2006: PWI

May 2006: VIS

June 2006: EFI

July 2006: TIMAS

August 2006: Hydra

September 2006:  MFE

 

1. Operations

If you have any concerns about Polar operations, please contact Nicky Fox (nicola.fox@jhuapl.edu)

 

Eclipse Operations

 

The Fall eclipse season begins August 19, 2005 and ends September 10, 2005.  The longest eclipses are 100 minutes.  Looking at Polar's eclipse performance last year, as well as in 1999 when we experienced shadows of comparable duration, it appears that only PWI should be powered off.  In the past we have powered off PWI just before each orbit's eclipse entry and powered on right after eclipse end.  PWI remains powered for the majority of each orbit during the shadow season to allow EFI access to Search Coil data.  PWI commanding is done by the FOT from the Stored Command Table.  FOT recommends using this power cycling method again.

In addition, PIXIE, SEPS and CAMMICE/MICS will remain powered off throughout the eclipse season as they are not operational.

 

Sun Angle Maneuver

The next Polar maneuver is tentatively scheduled for November 14, 2005.

 

GTM Upsets

At 17:40:55 UTC on Sunday, July 31 (DOY 212), the Polar GTM experienced an upset. This was the nineteenth upset overall since launch. The upset was identified prior to the real-time support that started at 1910 UTC on DSS-46 thanks to early data acquisition. The TIMAS, MFE, and HYDRA instruments were affected. TIDE telemetry appeared nominal, though an error flag was later reset. At 1907 UTC, the procedure was initiated with commands to recover the GTM. The commanding was completed at 2050 UTC. Commanding for instrument recovery was as follows:

 

UTC             Instrument action

19:12:01        MFE ADC turned OFF

19:15:30        MFE ADC turned ON

19:16:06        MAG electronics turned OFF

19:17:34        MAG electronics turned ON

19:21:16        HYDRA write protect enabled

19:39:59        TIMAS recovery

20:43:09        MFE flipper recovery

 

On August 1st the TIDE error flag was reset at 12:29:09 UTC.

 

Polar GTM Upset History:

 

GTM-1 Upset Events

* May 6, 1998 (DOY 126, 08:15:27)

* September 30, 1998 (DOY 273, 14:00:05)

* October 22, 1998 (DOY 295, 21:48:50)

* September 22, 2000 (DOY 266, 01:26:44)

 

GTM Switch March 27, 2001 (DOY 086, 22:00)

 

GTM-2 Upset Events

* November 10, 2003 (DOY 314, 18:26:38)

* November 17, 2003 (DOY 321, 15:13:36)

* November 24, 2003 (DOY 328, 16:38:08)

* December 6, 2003 (DOY 340, 21:44:27)

* December 18, 2003 (DOY 352, 09:37:02)

* February 12, 2004 (DOY 043, 03:04:52)

* March 3, 2004 (DOY 063, 20:14:33)

* April 3, 2004 (DOY 094, 09:04:59)

* July 29, 2004 (DOY 211, 20:51:19)

* November 13, 2004 (DOY 318, 18:37:34)

* January 21, 2005 (DOY 021, 04:00:58)

* May 21, 2005 (DOY 141, 09:04:54)

* June 3, 2005 (DOY 154, 07:57:08)

* June 12, 2005 (DOY 165, 22:14:31)

* July 31, 2005 (DOY 212, 17:40:55)

 

 

2. MFE Data Processing Status

PolarMFEreport_2005_Aug5.pdf

 

3. The 2006 Senior Review Proposal

The PI teams should have received a copy of the third draft of the science section from the proposal for comment.

 

WE ARE MAKING EVERY EFFORT TO STAY ON SCHEDULE TO ENSURE THAT WE CAN DELIVER THE HIGHEST QUALITY PRODUCT SO PLEASE RESPOND TO REQUESTS FOR INPUT IN A TIMELY FASHION.

 

There are a number of holes in the document as it stands to date – these are detailed below. These action items must be completed by August 12th.

 

The next draft of the proposal will be the version sent to the Red Team so this is your last chance to submit comments prior to that. Please note the deadline of August 12th – this is a firm deadline and we will not be able to include material received after this date in the Red Team version as this needs to be sent out by August 16th.

 

The version presented to the Red Team will be typeset – this means that we need high resolution versions of any figures sent in by August 12th. If you are having difficulties finding high resolution figures, you must let us know immediately so that the printing schedule is not affected.

 

Science Sections:

 

Everyone needs to review the future science sections and send comments nicola.fox@jhuapl.edu

and john.b.sigwarth@nasa.gov. The auroral acceleration region still needs figures!!!

 

2.1 Polar radiation belt science in the 2005-2006 interval: A return to the heart of the outer zone. Lead authors: Paul O’Brien & Bern Blake

Reviewers: Reiner Friedel; Martin Walt, Geoff Reeves

 

2.2 Microscale and macroscale physics of magnetic reconnection. Lead author: Karlheinz Trattner

Reviewers: Ted Fritz; Bill Peterson; Jack Scudder

 

2.3 Auroral acceleration region. Lead author: Chris Russell

Reviewers: Nelson Maynard; George Parks; Rob Pfaff

 

Accomplishments section:

 

The section needs figures

 

Please take some time to read this section thoroughly and make sure that your team’s accomplishments are accurately reflected. The section still needs some editing but most of the material submitted should be included. Many thanks to the teams who have responded with their recent accomplishments.

 

CEPPAD and PIXIE are still outstanding

 

There is not enough material in the Great Storms sub-section. We need to show that Polar is playing its role in the S3C Great Observatory – the great storm studies are one of the most high profile ways to do this. What did we see during the Halloween storms for example?

 

Please try to add text directly into the document (switch on track changes or at least insert text in red) failing that, you may send paragraphs containing your team’s achievements to Nicky (nicola.fox@jhuapl.edu).

 

We also need to include information on how many other people use Polar data – how many SR&T, TR&T and GI grants use Polar data. Please also send that information to Nicky – so far only EFI and MDI have sent this material

 

Section 3: Technical and Budget

 

Draft 3 contains some portion of the technical and budget section, including a sub-section about the health of the instruments. Most teams have responded with updates to their instrument status but CEPPAD and PIXIE are still outstanding – please take a moment to email your status paragraphs to Nicky.

 

Section 4: Education and Public Outreach

 

The next draft will include the E/PO section. Please send in any E/PO activities carried out by your team members since the last Senior Review (2003). We only have information about the APL group so far.

 

Polar Senior Review Development Schedule:

May 6: Polar PI telecon

May 6-May 13: Skeleton Draft

May 13-20: writing assignments, formation of Red Team

May 23-27: AGU meeting in New Orleans (can we get together)

June 1-24: Draft 1 (circulated 23rd), Polar PI Telecon 24th)

June 27-July 1: GEM meeting in Santa Fe (can we get together)

July 5-11: Draft 2 (circulated 11th, Polar PI Telecon 15th)

July18-29: IAGA meeting in Toulouse, France

July 15-August 5: Draft 3 (circulated August 4th, Polar PI Telecon 5th)

 

August 8-14: Draft 4

August 16: Draft 4 sent to Red Team

August 25: Red Team Review

August 26: Polar PI Telecon

August 27-September 5: Draft 5 (circulated 5th)

September 12-19: Draft 6 to PI team for last review/editing, Polar telecon (16th)

September 20-26: final formatting, proofing

September 27-30: Printing and delivery

 

4. Resident Archives

NASA/HQ has indicated that there may be a small amount of funding available for after the end of mission for the maintenance of Resident Archives of the data at the PI institutions.  This would provide a small amount of money for maintaining the hardware that serves up data and a fraction of an FTE to keep the hardware working.  In this round of senior reviews, this applies especially to Polar as it nears the end of its MODA life.  Chuck Holmes will be asking for input from the Polar mission in the form of a short white paper.  Please give this some thought over the next few weeks as I expect the turn around on the request to be quite short. 

 

 

5.  MFE Science Report

http://spc.igpp.ucla.edu/polar/polartelecon/