POLAR Telecon Agenda for March 31,
2006
Agenda:
0. Upcoming Polar Telecon
1. Operations
2. Polar SWT Meeting
3. Polar Implementation Plan
4. Resident Archives
5. MFE Data Processing Status
6. Science Nuggets
7. CAMMICE Science Report
0. Upcoming Polar
Telecon
Friday, March 31, 2006
4 pm ET, 3 pm CT, 2 pm MT, 1 pm
PT
PIs and their designated
representatives will be telephoned at their usual numbers.
Other participants may call in
at:
800-857-6258, password POLAR
TELECON
(Leader: John Sigwarth)
The web site for the final agenda
will be:
http://pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov/polar/telecons/2006Mar31/
Future Polar Telecons
There will be no telecon in April
Next telecon:
Future Telecon
Science Discussion Schedule
[Errors/omissions/preferences to:
nicola.fox@jhuapl.edu]
May 2006:
June 2006: EFI
July 2006: TIMAS
August 2006: Hydra
September 2006: MFE
October 2006: CEPPAD
November 2006: TIDE
December 2006: PIXIE
January 2007, SEPS
February 2007, UVI
March 2007: MDI
April 2007: CAMMICE
1. Operations
If you have any concerns about
Polar operations, please contact Nicky Fox (nicola.fox@jhuapl.edu)
Sun Angle Maneuver
The next Polar maneuver is tentatively scheduled for October 21, 2006
Polar's operating downlink Solid State Power Amplifier, SSPA-2, suffered a loss
of output power during a real-time contact. Prior to the anomaly, the
output power reading in telemetry was 17.08 W. Immediately after the
anomaly, the value dropped to 11.06 W. The corresponding Electronic Power
Converter (EPC) #2 voltage increased from 4.35 V to 4.43 V, consistent with a
reduced load on the power converter.
This anomaly is very similar to a failure (AR #487) that occurred on SSPA-1 on
December 12, 2002 (02/346/16:05:00z). SSPA-1 telemetry showed an output
power reading of 12.75 W versus the nominal 16.5 W. EPC-1 voltage
increased from 4.33 V to 4.37 V. An Anomaly Resolution Team (ART) was
convened and a report was issued at that time. Similar anomalies also
occurred on the Wind spacecraft in 1997 and 2000.
The Polar Flight Operations Team (FOT) is
evaluating the operational benefit of using the hemi antennas in addition to
the belt antennas. These hemi antennas are designed for 0-60 and 120-180 degree
aspect angles so their use would be limited to supports which lie entirely
within these ranges – roughly 33-50% of supports. Two tests are anticipated
which will verify the performance of the hemi antennas.
2. Polar SWT Meeting
The next Polar Science Working Team meeting will take place on June 7-8,
2006, at The Doubletree Hotel & Executive Meeting Center, Berkeley Marina,
3. Polar Implementation Plan
The following information summarizes the Polar project response to the
directions and guidelines from NASA HQ for the Polar Mission as a result of the
Senior Review.
Polar
Polar Project Scientist: John B. Sigwarth
Polar Deputy Project Scientist: Mark L. Adrian
The Polar Mission respectfully submits this implementation plan in response to the issued directions and guidelines resulting from the 2005 Senior Review of Mission Operations and Data Analysis Programs in the Sun-Sun Solar System Connections Theme.
Budget
The revised Polar Mission budget for FY 2007 and 2008 is
attached to this implementation plan.
The budget meets the funding guidelines provided in the letter from
Richard Fisher dated
FY2007
Polar spacecraft operations will be reduced to the bare
minimum to accommodate the resources provided.
Every effort will be made to make mission and instrument operation more
efficient so that, as program personnel leave through attrition, they will not
need to be replaced. Realized savings in
the operations budget will be used to prolong spacecraft operations as far into
the future as possible with the nominal end date of operations being
The sharp reduction in funding in FY2007 from the proposed
$6,430.1 K to the guideline $4,000K is too large to be absorbed by ramp-down
funding of non-radiation belt/non-imaging instruments alone. Consequently all instrument teams will be
ramped down in FY2007 in order to meet the funding guideline. Fortunately, most
of the instrument teams have grant or contract anniversary dates between
January 1 and
For FY2007, the funding level for radiation belt instruments (CEPPAD, MFE, EFI, and CAMMICE) has been reduced. This reduced funding level is sufficient to allow these instruments to complete the radiation belt science investigations, as proposed in the Polar Senior Review proposal, in accordance with the issued directions and guidelines.
The imaging instrument teams (UVI and
In order to meet the overall funding guideline for the Polar Mission, all other teams have been given a planned ramp down funding profile.
Additionally, all instrument teams have been directed to begin preparations for resident archiving and final archiving of mission data.
FY2008
The funding guideline of $2.0M for FY2008 is smaller than the proposed $2.85 M. For FY2008, the funding levels are held constant at the FY2007 ramped down levels for each instrument through March 2008 (i.e. the end of 1 year of data processing and documentation ramp down). This aligns all instrument funding to the end of March 2008. The remainder of the FY2008 funding has been designated for 6 months of initial setup and support of the resident archives.
As directed there is no funding guideline for FY2009 and
FY2010. All of the Polar instrument
teams are aware that the FY2008 funding will need to be stretched as far as
possible into the future to allow completion of the archival tasks, but the
nominal end date for completion of the Polar mission is
Archiving
As stated above, all instrument teams have been directed to begin preparing their data for resident archiving and final archiving.
Resident Archives
The Polar team embraces the concept of resident archiving of Polar data for its continued use by the scientific community. The Polar team is conducting a trade study to identify the most cost effective approach for creating resident archives for all Polar instruments. One approach under consideration would, where appropriate, combine the data sets of instrumentation sponsored by a single institution. Another potential approach would combine data sets across institutional lines where similar instrumentation allows for leveraging of limited resources. Many of the Polar instrument teams have rudimentary resident archives in place. It is envisioned that these archives will be upgraded to meet the full requirements for final resident archive status.
In response to the letter of directions and guidelines presented to the Polar team, a requirement will be added to document procedures for producing scientifically useful data from the Polar instruments. The availability of these documented procedures will serve as a fundamental element of the resident archives.
Final archiving
The Polar mission was conceived with the NSSDC serving as the final repository of all processed data at the end of the mission. All of the instrument teams have been directed to finalize the preparation of the instrument data for final archiving.
DSN Requirements
Update
The POLAR Mission Director reviewed the requirements for DSN support of the POLAR observatory and determined no changes are necessary. POLAR currently schedules 28 tracks per week of 1 hour average duration. This is the minimum requirement to downlink the spacecraft recorder and includes sufficient time to concurrently uplink the stored command load. POLAR maneuvers are planned by the Flight Dynamics Facility through the end of mission and require support from a primary antenna for up to 6 hours duration depending on the amount of data on the recorder and the duration of the maneuver. The Mission Director has waived requirements for backup station support due to the fact that the maneuvers are not time critical.
The requirements for Polar's use of the DSN or the ‘User
Loading Profiles’ (ULPs) were submitted on November
4, 2005 in preparation for the formal Resource Allocation Review at the
Interplanetary Network Customer Forum (INCF) meeting at JPL on February 14,
2006. At that time, the End Of Extended Mission (EOEM)
was
Education and Public
Outreach
The Polar team appreciates the thorough review of Polar EPO efforts. The EPO review rated the intrinsic merit and relevance to NASA of the Polar EPO efforts in the very good category. The specific weaknesses given in the review are addressed below and enumerated to reflect the format found there.
C1 (1b)
The educator workshops will address customer needs working
closely with the existing space science teacher professional development
programs that take place at the Space Sciences Laboratory (SSL) at the
(STEM).
In addition for the "Information en Espanol",
the Polar E/PO team is partnering with the LWS E/PO team to translate and print
the Aurora poster, as well as the brochures on the northern lights, storms from
the Sun, and "killer" electrons.
The Polar Mission is making all of the Spanish E/PO materials available
to the LWS K-14 educator summer workshops at the
C1 (1d)
The
C2 (2b)
Polar is making a demonstrable contribution to attracting diverse populations to careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Specifically, we tap in to the pipeline though the teacher workshops allowing them access to Polar data and materials.
Sun-Earth Connection Education Forum (SECEF) will also be helping Polar reach users in museums and science centers; national parks; Girl Scouts USA; and amateur astronomers (e.g., Astronomical League, AAVSO).
C2 (2c)
The Space Place Spanish language columns allow direct access to Polar highlights by underserved and underutilized groups. Translated products will be developed in consultation with members of the Spanish-speaking communities they are intended to serve.
SECEF will also be helping the Polar team reach users in numerous minority and professional groups such as the National Society of Black Engineers, La Raza, AGU, AAS, and World Hope.
4. Resident Archives
The Polar mission is directed to
write a white paper proposing the structure of resident archives for the Polar
data. We are encouraged to take as many cost saving measures as possible
(i.e.) combining data sets within institutions or across institutions where it
makes financial sense. This white paper on the Polar resident archives is
due
Previously we had agreed on the following principles for the resident archives:
1. The
resident archives are to be distributed at the PI institutions or their
designated locations where the expertise in handling the specific data
resides. (GSFC is not to be the sole
repository for all of the data).
2.
Maximal support might be of order 1/4 FTE (i.e., ~$50 K plus hardware
maintenance)
3. The
archives should provide the highest possible resolution (spatial and temporal).
4. The
data should be available without human intervention.
5. The
archive should provide dynamic access to virtual observatories.
6.
Every site should provide direct links with brief descriptions of every
other Polar site.
7.
Every archive should allow ASCII downloads of low and high resolution
data for replotting by the requestor.
8. Every site should allow plots of the data,
either previously made or made on demand
9.
Positional and attitude information for the Polar spacecraft should be
provided at one or more sites.
10. Documented
procedures for producing scientifically useful data from the Polar instruments will
be made available and will be a fundamental element of the resident
archives.
For information purposes, the
instructions for this white paper are given below.
Feb 7, 2006
SUBJECT:
Instructions for Resident Archive White Paper
The Heliophysics
Division is transforming our ways of archiving data by adopting the concept of
resident archives. Typically while a mission is active, its data are
served to the research community through a loose network of data servers
(active archives) that are located at mission data centers and instrument sites
as well as at multimission servers such as the Solar
Data Analysis Center and the Space Physics Data Facility. We are finding
that because of advances in information technology, it is desirable and cost
effective to continue serving mission data under the supervision of the
mission’s data providers; i.e. “resident” with the scientists that produced the
data. The architecture for networks of resident archives is diffuse and
all resident data sets will not stand alone. The concept allows for grass
roots consolidation of data servers along institutional lines, along lines of
comparable instruments, as well as along mission lines or in the multimission data facilities. Resident archives need
to seek their own low-cost solutions for continuation of service.
The period of “residence” will
not be “forever”. The resident archives will be subject to periodic peer
reviews to determine if the archive is still of value to the research
community, if it should it be merged with other resident archives, or if it
should be terminated with the data sets going to NASA’s permanent data
archives. We are formulating the processes for initiating, maintaining,
and reviewing resident archives.
Recent experiences have shown
that when a veteran mission retires, its data are not quite ready for their
resident archive(s). There is work to be done by the science team before
it disbands. Most instrument teams have lists of unfinished tasks,
improvements and updating documentation that are important but have not been
done due to higher priority activities while the mission is still
operating.
Prepare and submit a white paper
by June 1, 2006, discussing your concepts and configuration for establishing
one or more resident archives upon termination of your mission. In
addition, consider the hypothetical situation that your mission failed tomorrow
and describe those unfinished tasks that need to be done to serve your data to
the community from the resident archive. List the tasks in priority order
with the idea that the most important tasks will be accomplished within one
year following the cessation of operations. The less important may be
accomplished under the sponsorship of one of our competitive research programs.
5. MFE Data Processing Status
6. Science Nuggets
It has been a while since we have
produced any science nuggets to send to NASA headquarters and we have been
encouraged to create some. Please come to the telecon with some ideas for
content and send any materials to Nicky (nicola.fox@jhuapl.edu).
So far we have received inputs from the EFI, TIDE, MDI and TIMAS teams.
7. The CAMMICE Science Report
The
CAMMICE Science Report (Powerpoint)
The
CAMMICE Science Report (PDF)