The other "standard" connection scheme of resistors is in parallel--all resistors receiving input from the same point, and supplying their current to the same point.

In this case, all resistors sense the same voltage V, but the current I is divided between them, the smaller resistance drawing more current.

(By the way, electric cells may also be connected either in series or in parallel. Connecting them in series, as in a car battery, gives the combination a voltage V that is the sum of the voltages of all its cells.
    Connecting cells in parallel gives the same voltage as a single cell, but a much larger current can be extracted without an overload. However, all cells then better give the same voltage, or those producing a higher voltage will start charging those of lower voltage.)

    An array of resistors in parallel   R₁, R₂, R₃,... may also be replaced by a single "equivalent resistance" R. Suppose we have 3 resistors. Since all are fed from the same voltage V and Ohm's law is obeyed by each, their currents are

If as in the preceding section

The rule is: resistances in series have an equivalent resistance larger than any of them, while resistances in parallel have an equivalent resistance smaller than any of them.

Practice problems to work out:

(1) 5 resistors of 10 Ω in parallel... R = ?
(2) Resistors of 60Ω, 90Ω and 150Ω in parallel ... R = ?

Applications

    Most probably because by mistake you wired both lamps in series, not in parallel, so that the same current passed through both and each got only 55 volts. Want to be sure? Unscrew one--the other should go dark, too.

    Of course, the total current you can draw from a home circuit is limited. If you connect too many lights and appliances, or somehow connect wires with opposite voltages directly (a "short circuit" with very little resistance), your circuit will draw a very large electric current. As discussed later in section 8, that releases too many "watts" of electrical power in the wiring carrying the current, causing it to get dangerously hot. In most homes, a fuse or a circuit breaker (to be discussed later) then automatically disconnects the power, and the circuit will go dark. That will be your warning--before an excessive current melts your wiring, burns insulation or perhaps starts a house fire; newspaper reports of fires often end with "...the fire chief believes the fire had an electrical origin," and that is how it happens.

    To derive the current drawn by a more complicated circuit, you can often start by replacing combinations of resistors with equivalent resistances. For instance, with the circuit shown here you first replace the two resistors in parallel with their equivalent single resistance R₄

    Such a situation arises with batteries and cells under heavy load. The current they supply has to overcome not only the resistance, in the external circuit but also the internal resistance R_i of the conducting liquid ("electrolyte") which closes the circuit inside the battery or cell (to be sure, this is a simplified pictures). R_i is generally small, but it sets a limit to the current which can be extracted, even when the terminals are connected directly ("shorted out").

    The above circuit (conceptually, not in actual values) may be viewed as representing the circuit of a car, with R₃=4Ω the internal resistance of the battery (actual value probably less), and R₁=20Ω the resistance of the headlights, which draw a moderate current. Some voltage may drop while overcoming R₃, but not much. However, when the electrical starter is connected (represented by R₂=5Ω) the effective load with R_i=4Ω equals the internal resistance of the battery, and therefore only half the available voltage appears across the circuit AB of the headlights.
    As often observed at night, when the car headlights are lit. The moment the starter is connected, those lights get visibly dimmer.

Node analysis             (optional)

This circuit cannot be resolved into separate resistors in parallel and in series (at least not in the usual way).
-----------------------------     There does exist a general method, outlined below, but it may take hard work; only knowing that it exists is usually enough for most studies.

        That method is based on the idea that in any complicated network of resistors connected to some voltage source, any nth resistor R_n, its current I_n and the voltage difference ΔV_n between its ends (delta or Δ [capital D in Greek] generally denotes "difference") are connected by Ohm's law

I_n   =   ΔV_n/ R_n                        (1)
As long as that law holds, the resistance of an array is the same for any applied voltage, so let us assume ΔV = 10V between A and B--say V=10 at A and V=0 at B, since the choice of the point where V=0 is arbitrary. That leaves 6 corners of "nodes" where wires meet, with voltages V₁, V₂, V₃, ... V₆. The first 3 voltages will be assigned to points (A₁,A₂,A₃) connected directly to A, the last 3 will be the voltages of (B₁,B₂,B₃) connected directly to B

    There also exist 6 equations, one for each node, expressing the requirement that "what flows in equals what flows out". Six equations with 6 unknown can usually be solved: use one to express V₆ in terms of the others, use the relation to replace V₆ in the remaining 5 equations. Then do the same to V₅ reducing the number of equations to 4, and so on, until one voltage remains, expressed by the remaining one equation.

   
If all resistors were not the same, this sort of drudgery might be the only way to derive the equivalent resistame (though a computer code may help). Here however every resistor is the same, namely 1Ω, and one can take advantage of symmetries.

    But you can also find a 3-fold symmetry. Look down diagonally down on one corner, as in the image on the right. Imagine a thin straight rod entering the cube at that point and coming out again at the most distant corner in the bottom (the rod will go through the middle of the cube). Three edges of the cube come out of that corner: if you rotate the cube around the rod by 120°, it will appear again as the one in the picture, but now the 3 edges have changed their positions. If you rotate 3 times by 120°, all edges (and other parts of the cube are back where they were at first: a 3-fold symmetry.

    In the cube of 12 resistors (larger drawing), let corner "A" be the corner where the rod entered, corner "B" the one where it comes out again. The rod is replaced by the conductors bringing current to A and taking it out again from B; there is no need for its middle portion and it is not drawn.

    At point "A" three resistors spread out symmetrically to points (A₁,A₂,A₃). Because of the 3-fold symmetry, the positions in the circuit of the 3 resistors leading to them are completely equivalent: not only are they equal, but the current from each continues to two resistors of 1 Ω, each of which leads to one of corners (B₁,B₂,B₃). These corners are also completely equivalent, by a similar argument.

    One concludes that the 3 different directions in which electric currents spread from A are completely similar. One therefore expect the 3 currents to be equal. If the current entering "A" equals I amperes, then each of these currents has intensity I/3. By Ohm's law, the voltage drop along each of the resistors connected at A is also the same, so the voltage at points (A₁,A₂,A₃) must also be the same. We name it V₁

    Node B has exactly the same symmetry with respect to (B₁,B₂,B₃), so if a current of I amperes leaves the cube from point B (it must equal the current that enters!), each resistor connected directly to it also carries a current I/3. Again, the voltages at these 3 points are expected to be the same, and we name it V₂.

    Finally all 6 resistors starting from points (A₁,A₂,A₃) have the same value of resistance (=1Ω) and carry currents from voltage V₁ to voltage V₂. By Ohm's law, each must carry the same current, half the current entering each of these corners, which makes it equal to I/6.

    Time now to collect all the information and see if we can derive from it the connection between I and V. Three currents emerge from A, each carrying 1/3 of the total current I and satisfying

Puzzlers

    Answer     In the cube just studied, A₂ and A₃ have both the same voltage, namely V₁. If we connected them by any resistor (of whatever value), no current would flow in it, because both ends are at the same voltage. So R remains the same, 5/6 Ω

    This suggests the problem could be solved even faster by a trick based on its symmetry. Since (A₁,A₂,A₃) are all at the same voltage, we might as well connect them by a wire of negligible resistance, so in the electric circuit they become the same point--call it "C".

    Similarly (B₁,B₂,B₃) are at the same voltage, may also be connected directly and be electrically the same point in the circuit--call it "D". With these shortcuts

From A to C : three 1 Ω resistors in parallel, equivalent to R₁ = 1/3 Ω
From C to D : six 1 Ω resistors in parallel, equivalent to R₂ = 1/6 Ω
From D to B again three 1 Ω resistors in parallel, equivalent to R₃ = 1/3 Ω

    The 3 equivalent resistors are connected in series, so they give

Equation (2) above now changes to